Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rasmussen, B. Articles by Fletcher, I. R. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Testing ore deposit models using in situ U-Pb geochronology of hydrothermal monazite: Paleoproterozoic gold mineralization in northern Australia

¹ School of Earth and Geographical Sciences, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
² Geological Survey of Western Australia, 100 Plain Street, East Perth, WA 6004, Australia
³ School of Earth and Geographical Sciences, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia

The inability to establish absolute ages for gold deposition in the Pine Creek orogen of northern Australia has led to conflicting ore deposit models, ranging from intrusion related, which predict that gold mineralization was synchronous with granite magmatism (ca. 1835–1820 Ma), to orogenic, which place ore deposition nearly 100 m.y. later. Here we present ion microprobe U-Pb geochronology for a mineralized quartz reef from Tom's Gully mine, Mount Bundey, Northern Territory, Australia, and nearby granitic rocks and associated contact aureoles. Isotopic dating of zircon and monazite indicates that intrusion and contact metamorphism occurred ca. 1825 Ma, whereas hydrothermal monazite from the auriferous quartz reef gives a mean ²⁰⁷Pb/²⁰⁶Pb age of 1780 ± 10 Ma, interpreted as the time of gold mineralization. Mineralization therefore postdated intrusion by 45 m.y. and preceded a postulated ca. 1740–1730 Ma cratonwide orogenic gold event by 50 m.y. Hence, neither the intrusion-related model nor the recently proposed orogenic model is applicable. Combined with a reevaluation of age data from the nearby Goodall gold deposit, our data suggest that mineralization coincides with, and may be related to, an episode of regional low-grade metamorphism, deformation, and fluid circulation (Shoobridge event). Our results demonstrate the importance of high-precision in situ geochronology and detailed petrography for deciphering age relationships in ore deposits, and of testing the veracity of models for ore formation.

Key Words: geochronology • hydrothermal mineralization • monazite • Pine Creek orogen • SHRIMP data • gold deposits

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. S. Sarma, N. J. Mcnaughton, I. R. Fletcher, D. I. Groves, M. R. Mohan, and V. Balaram TIMING OF GOLD MINERALIZATION IN THE HUTTI GOLD DEPOSIT, DHARWAR CRATON, SOUTH INDIA Economic Geology, December 1, 2008; 103(8): 1715 - 1727. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Rasmussen, I. R. Fletcher, J. R. Muhling, A. G. Mueller, and G. C. Hall Bushveld-aged fluid flow, peak metamorphism, and gold mobilization in the Witwatersrand basin, South Africa: Constraints from in situ SHRIMP U-Pb dating of monazite and xenotime Geology, October 1, 2007; 35(10): 931 - 934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]