Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; March 2006; v. 34; no. 3; p. 165-168; DOI: 10.1130/G22027.1
© 2006 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aharonov, E.
Right arrow Articles by Anders, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Hot water: A solution to the Heart Mountain detachment problem?

Einat Aharonov1 and Mark H. Anders2

1 Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
2 Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences and Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York 10964, USA

The Heart Mountain block slide of northwestern Wyoming and southwestern Montana is one of the largest slides known to have occurred in Earth's history. This early Eocene block slide covered an area of over 3400 km2 and moved a minimum of 45 km across open terrain. The initial 2- to 4-km-thick Heart Mountain block slide moved on a slope of about 2°, detaching for half its length on a nondescript bedding plane in the Ordovician Big Horn Dolomite (BHD). Given our current understanding of fundamental mechanics, such a great mass of rock should not have begun sliding on such a gentle slope without some special condition. Here we suggest that a special condition existed during the interval between extensive upper-plate dike injections and the initial movement phase. In our model, the dike injections increased horizontal stresses and heated the surrounding layers. Both the increased stresses and the heat input elevated fluid pressure of water trapped within the BHD. In addition, vertical hydrofracturing was retarded as horizontal stress approached vertical, thus allowing a critical buildup of fluid pressure. Fluid overpressuring is a mechanism that can overcome the mechanical problem of initiating movement on a low-angle surface. Moreover, this mechanism explains the observed fluidized features found along the basal contact of the slide block as well as the observed lack of deformation in the lower plate.

Key Words: Heart Mountain detachment • pore pressure • dikes • block slides




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
J. P. Craddock, D. H. Malone, J. Magloughlin, A. L. Cook, M. E. Rieser, and J. R. Doyle
Dynamics of the emplacement of the Heart Mountain allochthon at White Mountain: Constraints from calcite twinning strains, anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility, and thermodynamic calculations
Geological Society of America Bulletin, May 1, 2009; 121(5-6): 919 - 938.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America