Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Carroll, A. R. Articles by Smith, M. E. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Feast to famine: Sediment supply control on Laramide basin fill

¹ Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wisconsin, 1215 W. Dayton Street, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA

Erosion of Laramide-style uplifts in the western United States exerted an important first-order influence on Paleogene sedimentation by controlling sediment supply rates to adjacent closed basins. During the latest Cretaceous through Paleocene, these uplifts exposed thick intervals of mud-rich Upper Cretaceous foreland basin fill, which was quickly eroded and redeposited. Cretaceous sedimentary lithologies dominate Paleocene conglomerate clast compositions, and the volume of eroded foreland basin strata is approximately twice the volume of preserved Paleocene basin fill. As a result of this sediment oversupply, clastic alluvial and paludal facies dominate Paleocene strata, and are associated with relatively shallow and ephemeral freshwater lake facies. In contrast, large, long-lived, carbonate-producing lakes occupied several of the basins during the Eocene. Basement-derived clasts (granite, quartzite, and other metamorphic rocks) simultaneously became abundant in lower Eocene conglomerate. We propose that Eocene lakes developed primarily due to exposure of erosion-resistant lithologies within cores of Laramide uplifts. The resultant decrease in erosion rate starved adjacent basins of sediment, allowing the widespread and prolonged deposition of organic-rich lacustrine mudstone. These observations suggest that geomorphic evolution of the surrounding landscape should be considered as a potentially important influence on sedimentation in many other interior basins, in addition to more conventionally interpreted tectonic and climatic controls.

Key Words: Fort Union Formation • Green River Formation • Paleocene • Eocene • lacustrine

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. J. Davis, H. T. Mix, B. A. Wiegand, A. R. Carroll, and C. P. Chamberlain Synorogenic evolution of large-scale drainage patterns: Isotope paleohydrology of sequential Laramide basins Am J Sci, September 1, 2009; 309(7): 549 - 602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. E. Smith, A. R. Carroll, and B. S. Singer Synoptic reconstruction of a major ancient lake system: Eocene Green River Formation, western United States Geological Society of America Bulletin, January 1, 2008; 120(1-2): 54 - 84. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. M. Burgess, H. Lammers, C. van Oosterhout, and D. Granjeon Multivariate sequence stratigraphy: Tackling complexity and uncertainty with stratigraphic forward modeling, multiple scenarios, and conditional frequency maps AAPG Bulletin, December 1, 2006; 90(12): 1883 - 1901. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]