Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dokka, R. K. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Modern-day tectonic subsidence in coastal Louisiana

¹ Center for GeoInformatics and Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA

Subsidence is leading to the slow inundation of communities and wetlands of Louisiana, Mississippi, Texas, and Alabama (United States) by the Gulf of Mexico. The prevailing paradigm considers subsidence to be the result of young sediment compaction and/or consolidation and human activities. This paper describes the results of a test of this theory based on an examination of historic motions of benchmark in the Michoud area of Orleans Parish, Louisiana. This methodology allowed for an assessment of vertical change at different levels over time relative to a precise vertical datum (North American Vertical Datum of 1988, NAVD88). Data do not support the current theory on the origins of subsidence; they demonstrate that tectonic causes dominate in the study area. During 1969– 1971 and 1971–1977, tectonism was responsible for –16.9 mm/yr and –7.1 mm/yr of subsidence, respectively. These contributions account for 73% and 50% of the total subsidence during these intervals. The change in deep subsidence is attributed to renewed motion along a large normal fault (Michoud fault). Over the same time intervals, intermediate depth subsidence due to compaction of Pleistocene to middle Miocene strata was constant (–4.6 mm/yr). Similarly, subsidence due to shallow processes, i.e., sediment compaction and groundwater offtake, was –1.5 mm/yr and –2.5 mm/yr. Subsidence associated with petroleum extraction was not a factor due to the lack of local production.

Key Words: tectonic subsidence • Louisiana • Gulf of Mexico • Michoud fault

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. D. Blum, J. H. Tomkin, A. Purcell, and R. R. Lancaster Ups and downs of the Mississippi Delta Geology, September 1, 2008; 36(9): 675 - 678. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Engelkemeir and S. D. Khan Lidar mapping of faults in Houston, Texas, USA Geosphere, February 1, 2008; 4(1): 170 - 182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. E. Tornqvist, S. J. Bick, K. van der Borg, and A. F.M. de Jong How stable is the Mississippi Delta? Geology, August 1, 2006; 34(8): 697 - 700. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]