Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; May 2006; v. 34; no. 5; p. 321-324; DOI: 10.1130/G22071.1
© 2006 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ghosh, A.
Right arrow Articles by Haines, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Gravitational potential energy of the Tibetan Plateau and the forces driving the Indian plate

Attreyee Ghosh1, William E. Holt1, Lucy M. Flesch*,2 and A. John Haines{dagger},3

1 Department of Geosciences, State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York 11790, USA
2 Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, DC 20015, USA
3 Bullard Laboratories, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0EZ, UK

We present a study of the vertically integrated deviatoric stress field for the Indian plate and the Tibetan Plateau associated with gravitational potential energy (GPE) differences. Although the driving forces for the Indian plate have been attributed solely to the mid-oceanic ridges that surround the entire southern boundary of the plate, previous estimates of vertically integrated stress magnitudes of ~6–7 x 1012 N/m in Tibet far exceed those of ~3 x 1012 N/m associated with GPE at mid-oceanic ridges, calling for an additional force to satisfy the stress magnitudes in Tibet. We use the Crust 2.0 data set to infer gravitational potential energy differences in the lithosphere. We then apply the thin sheet approach in order to obtain a global solution of vertically integrated deviatoric stresses associated only with GPE differences. Our results show large N-S extensional deviatoric stresses in Tibet that the ridge-push force fails to cancel. Our results calibrate the magnitude of the basal tractions, associated with density buoyancy driven mantle flow, that are applied at the base of the lithosphere in order to drive India into Tibet and cancel the N-S extensional stresses within Tibet. Moreover, our deviatoric stress field solution indicates that both the ridge-push influence (~1 x 1012 N/m) and the vertically integrated deviatoric stresses associated with GPE differences around the Tibetan Plateau (~3 x 1012 N/m) have previously been overestimated by a factor of two or more. These overestimates have resulted from either simplified two-dimensional approximations of the thin sheet equations, or from an assumption about the mean stress that is unlikely to be correct.

Key Words: gravitational potential energy • plate tectonics • Indian plate • deviatoric stress • basal tractions • driving forces




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
J.P. PLATT
From orogenic hinterlands to Mediterranean-style back-arc basins: a comparative analysis
Journal of the Geological Society, March 1, 2007; 164(2): 297 - 311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America