|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
1 College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, 104 Ocean Administration Building, Corvallis, Oregon 97331-5503, USA
2 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-0740, USA
We present new Mo isotope data from the Mexican continental margin that, in conjunction with previous data, allow us to propose a mechanistic description of the Mo isotope system in marine sediments. We hypothesize that there are unique environmentally dependent Mo isotope signatures recorded in marine sediments that reflect the mechanisms responsible for authigenic Mo accumulation. Open-ocean anoxic sites, defined as having dissolved oxygen and sulfide concentrations near zero in the overlying water, exhibit a
98/95Mo isotope signature of +1.6
. We believe this value reflects Mo sulfide formation via diagenetic processes within sediments. Quantitative formation of Mo sulfide within the sulfidic water column of euxinic environments results in sediment isotope values similar to the modern seawater value (+2.3
), as typified by samples from the highly sulfidic Black Sea. In contrast to these reducing settings, manganese oxiderich sediments have measured Mo isotope values that are more negative (relative to seawater) than any other sediment samples analyzed to date, similar to Fe-Mn crusts (
0.7
). Most measured Mo isotope compositions of marine sediments from open-ocean settings appear to reflect a mixture of lithogenic Mo (0.0
) and the Mo signature of a specific authigenic Mo accumulation mechanism. We therefore suggest that Mo isotopes may record unique signatures that reflect the dominant chemical mechanism for Mo sequestration into sediments.
Key Words: molybdenum isotopes diagenesis sediments
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G.W. Gordon, T.W. Lyons, G.L. Arnold, J. Roe, B.B. Sageman, and A.D. Anbar When do black shales tell molybdenum isotope tales? Geology, June 1, 2009; 37(6): 535 - 538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Neubert, T. F. Nagler, and M. E. Bottcher Sulfidity controls molybdenum isotope fractionation into euxinic sediments: Evidence from the modern Black Sea Geology, October 1, 2008; 36(10): 775 - 778. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. R. Pearce, A. S. Cohen, A. L. Coe, and K. W. Burton Molybdenum isotope evidence for global ocean anoxia coupled with perturbations to the carbon cycle during the Early Jurassic Geology, March 1, 2008; 36(3): 231 - 234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Anbar and G. W. Gordon Redox renaissance Geology, March 1, 2008; 36(3): 271 - 272. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.L. Hannah, H.J. Stein, M.E. Wieser, J.R. de Laeter, and M.D. Varner Molybdenum isotope variations in molybdenite: Vapor transport and Rayleigh fractionation of Mo Geology, August 1, 2007; 35(8): 703 - 706. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |