Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; August 2006; v. 34; no. 8; p. 629-632; DOI: 10.1130/G22647.1
© 2006 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (16)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Staubwasser, M.
Right arrow Articles by Schoenberg, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Iron isotopes in the early marine diagenetic iron cycle

M. Staubwasser1, F. von Blanckenburg1 and R. Schoenberg1

1 University of Hannover, Institute of Mineralogy, Callinstrasse 3, 30167 Hannover, Germany

Measurements of Fe oxyhydroxides [reactive Fe(III)] in two shallow sediment profiles from reducing and oxic environments on the Arabian Sea margin demonstrate Fe isotope fractionation during early marine diagenesis. Reactive Fe(III) has {delta}56Fe values between –0.77{per thousand} and –0.19{per thousand}. Values are lowest at the top of the sediment profile and considerably lower than bulk sediment Fe ({delta}56Fe {approx} 0{per thousand}). Preferential reduction and dissolution of light Fe isotopes during diagenesis leaves behind an increasingly smaller and heavier reactive Fe(III) residual. Initially, the isotopic composition of reactive Fe(III) evolves down-core according to the fractionation factor typical of microbial dissimilatory Fe reduction. Deeper in the profile, {delta}56Fe values remain unchanged despite further Fe reduction. Here, another process with a different fractionation factor becomes dominant, probably reduction by dissolved sulfide. The {delta}56Fe of the residual reactive Fe(III) suggests that ~25% of the initially present reactive Fe(III) was reduced by microbial Fe reduction. When Fe is diagenetically recycled between reducing sediments at depth and an oxic top layer, the process, depending on recycling efficiency, may result in the accumulation of light Fe in the top layer while the complementary heavier residual is buried. Fe diffusing from the seafloor back into the ocean should reflect the low-{delta}56Fe diagenetic source of dissolved Fe.

Key Words: Fe isotopes • early diagenesis • iron oxides • Arabian Sea




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
J. G. Wiederhold, N. Teutsch, S. M. Kraemer, A. N. Halliday, and R. Kretzschmar
Iron Isotope Fractionation during Pedogenesis in Redoximorphic Soils
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., October 29, 2007; 71(6): 1840 - 1850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeosphereHome page
M. A. Chan, C. M. Johnson, B. L. Beard, J. R. Bowman, and W.T. Parry
Iron isotopes constrain the pathways and formation mechanisms of terrestrial oxide concretions: A tool for tracing iron cycling on Mars?
Geosphere, December 1, 2006; 2(7): 324 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America