Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; August 2006; v. 34; no. 8; p. 681-684; DOI: 10.1130/G22581.1
© 2006 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Duebendorfer, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Fry, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Mojave-Yavapai boundary zone, southwestern United States: A rifting model for the formation of an isotopically mixed crustal boundary zone

Ernest M. Duebendorfer1, Kevin R. Chamberlain2 and Bill Fry*,3

1 Department of Geology, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona 86011, USA
2 Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming 82071, USA
3 Department of Geology, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona 86011, USA

The boundary between the Paleoproterozoic Mojave and Yavapai crustal provinces in the southwestern United States is a 75-km-wide zone characterized by complex, isotopically mixed (Pb) crust, similar to other transitional crustal and lithospheric boundaries worldwide. Mojave crust is more isotopically evolved than the juvenile crust of the Yavapai province, indicating an older crustal component. Several areas of isotopically juvenile rocks within and near the boundary zone correspond to exposures of coeval >1.73 Ga supracrustal rocks that contain pillow basalts and bimodal metavolcanic sequences. We suggest that regions of juvenile crust within the Mojave province and its boundary zone represent rift basins, produced by extension or transtension near the eastern margin of the province, into which primitive basaltic lavas and bimodal volcanic sequences were erupted. The largest region of juvenile material within the boundary zone is bound to the west by a series of coincident, N-trending isotopic, geochemical, metamorphic, and geophysical discontinuities that may represent a fundamental, buried crustal structure, perhaps a rift margin. We propose that the distinct isotopic signature of the boundary zone persisted through subsequent deformational events, including the one that juxtaposed the two provinces. If our model for the formation of the boundary zone is correct, its isotopically mixed character is at least partly an artifact of the precollision history of the eastern Mojave province, and may not solely reflect the processes that juxtaposed the two provinces. Formation of new crust by rifting may represent an underappreciated form of crustal growth during the Paleoproterozoic that is distinct from arc accretion. Models for the formation of complex crustal boundary zones must consider the early, prejuxtaposition history of terranes in interpreting their geochemical and geophysical characteristics.

Key Words: Proterozoic tectonics • southwestern United States • crustal boundaries • Mojave province • Yavapai province • isotopic boundaries




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
J. M. Amato, A. O. Boullion, A. M. Serna, A. E. Sanders, G. L. Farmer, G. E. Gehrels, and J. L. Wooden
Evolution of the Mazatzal province and the timing of the Mazatzal orogeny: Insights from U-Pb geochronology and geochemistry of igneous and metasedimentary rocks in southern New Mexico
Geological Society of America Bulletin, March 1, 2008; 120(3-4): 328 - 346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeosphereHome page
S. J. Whitmeyer and K. E. Karlstrom
Tectonic model for the Proterozoic growth of North America
Geosphere, August 1, 2007; 3(4): 220 - 259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeologyHome page
M.E. Bickford and B. M. Hill
Does the arc accretion model adequately explain the Paleoproterozoic evolution of southern Laurentia?: An expanded interpretation
Geology, February 1, 2007; 35(2): 167 - 170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America