Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Törnqvist, T. E. Articles by de Jong, A. F.M. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

How stable is the Mississippi Delta?

Torbjörn E. Törnqvist^*,1, Scott J. Bick^,2, Klaas van der Borg³ and Arie F.M. de Jong³

¹ Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Tulane University, 6823 St. Charles Avenue, New Orleans, Louisiana 70118-5698, USA
² Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, 845 West Taylor Street, Chicago, Illinois 60607-7059, USA
³ Robert J. Van de Graaff Laboratory, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80000, NL-3508 TA Utrecht, Netherlands

Large deltas are commonly believed to exhibit rapid rates of tectonic subsidence, largely due to sediment loading of the lithosphere. As a result, deltaic plains are prone to accelerated relative sea-level rise, coastal erosion, and wetland loss. Hurricane Katrina's devastation testifies to the severe threat that these processes pose to the Mississippi Delta, but the relative role of tectonics versus other mechanisms causing land subsidence remains elusive. Relative sea-level records derived from basal peat have the potential to quantify differential crustal movements over Holocene time scales with exceptionally high accuracy and precision. Here we present new sea-level index points from two study areas in the southwestern Mississippi Delta that essentially coincide with a recently published detailed relative sea-level record from the eastern part of the delta. Our results show that differential vertical movements among the three study areas have been only 0.1 mm yr^–1. We compare our evidence with a recent sea-level compilation from the Caribbean, to a large extent based on data from areas that are tectonically stable. Our sea-level index points nearly coincide with the Caribbean data, showing surprising tectonic stability for considerable sections of the Mississippi Delta. However, the well-documented high subsidence rates in and near the birdfoot of the Mississippi Delta indicate that different conditions prevail there. The rapid wetland loss in coastal Louisiana is likely due, to a considerable extent, to the compaction of Holocene strata.

Key Words: Mississippi Delta • sea-level change • subsidence • Holocene

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Edwards Sea levels: science and society Progress in Physical Geography, October 1, 2008; 32(5): 557 - 574. [PDF]

				M. D. Blum, J. H. Tomkin, A. Purcell, and R. R. Lancaster Ups and downs of the Mississippi Delta Geology, September 1, 2008; 36(9): 675 - 678. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. P. Donnelly and L. Giosan Tempestuous highs and lows in the Gulf of Mexico Geology, September 1, 2008; 36(9): 751 - 752. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. L. Whitehouse, M. B. Allen, and G. A. Milne Glacial isostatic adjustment as a control on coastal processes: An example from the Siberian Arctic Geology, August 1, 2007; 35(8): 747 - 750. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]