Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (26) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kendall, B. Articles by Selby, D. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Re-Os geochronology of postglacial black shales in Australia: Constraints on the timing of "Sturtian" glaciation

¹ Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, 1-26 Earth Sciences Building, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E3, Canada
² Department of Earth Sciences, University of Durham, Durham DH1 3LE, UK

New Re-Os dates obtained from black shales overlying the Sturtian and Areyonga glacial deposits in southern and central Australia, respectively, challenge the prevailing consensus of three Neoproterozoic glaciations. The end of Sturtian glaciation in the Adelaide Rift Complex is constrained by a Re-Os date of 643.0 ± 2.4 Ma from the overlying Tindelpina Shale Member (basal Tapley Hill Formation). A Re-Os date of 657.2 ± 5.4 Ma for the basal Aralka Formation constrains the age of the underlying Areyonga glacial deposits in the Amadeus Basin. The Re-Os ages show that the Sturtian and Areyonga glacial deposits are younger than other radiometrically dated (ca. 685–750 Ma) Neoproterozoic glacial intervals previously regarded as possible correlatives. Thus, the "Sturtian" ice age was markedly diachronous, and/or there was more than one "Sturtian"-type glaciation. Some Neoproterozoic glacial deposits may represent the products of regional and diachronous glaciation associated with protracted breakup of the supercontinent Rodinia rather than "snowball" or "slushball" Earth ice ages.

Key Words: Neoproterozoic • age determination • Australia • black shale • rhenium • osmium

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. W. Goodge, J. D. Vervoort, C. M. Fanning, D. M. Brecke, G. L. Farmer, I. S. Williams, P. M. Myrow, and D. J. DePaolo A Positive Test of East Antarctica-Laurentia Juxtaposition Within the Rodinia Supercontinent Science, July 11, 2008; 321(5886): 235 - 240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. J Peterson, J. A Cotton, J. G Gehling, and D. Pisani The Ediacaran emergence of bilaterians: congruence between the genetic and the geological fossil records Phil Trans R Soc B, April 27, 2008; 363(1496): 1435 - 1443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. Pazos, L. S. Bettucci, and J. Loureiro The Neoproterozoic glacial record in the Rio de la Plata Craton: a critical reappraisal Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2008; 294(1): 343 - 364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Chew, C. Kirkland, U. Schaltegger, and R. Goodhue Neoproterozoic glaciation in the Proto-Andes: Tectonic implications and global correlation Geology, December 1, 2007; 35(12): 1095 - 1098. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. J. Fairchild and M. J. Kennedy Neoproterozoic glaciation in the Earth System Journal of the Geological Society, September 1, 2007; 164(5): 895 - 921. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. RIEU, P. A. ALLEN, A. COZZI, J. KOSLER, and F. BUSSY A composite stratigraphy for the Neoproterozoic Huqf Supergroup of Oman: integrating new litho-, chemo- and chronostratigraphic data of the Mirbat area, southern Oman Journal of the Geological Society, September 1, 2007; 164(5): 997 - 1009. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]