Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Veenstra, E. Articles by Ferris, A. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Crustal thickness variation in south-central Alaska

¹ Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775-7320, USA
² Department of Earth Sciences, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA

Crustal thicknesses have been determined by receiver function analysis of broadband teleseismic waveforms recorded during the Broadband Experiment Across the Alaska Range (BEAAR). Typical crust beneath the northern lowlands is 26 km thick, while beneath the mountains it is 35–45 km thick. The transition from thick to thin crust coincides with the location of the Hines Creek fault, a major tectonostratigraphic boundary. Crustal thicknesses determined by receiver functions agree with those predicted from topography assuming Airy type isostasy, suggesting that the Alaska Range is compensated by its crustal root. North of the range, however, the crust is systematically thinner than predicted by simple Airy isostasy. A crustal density contrast of 4.6% across the Hines Creek fault, 2700 kg m^–3 to the north and 2830 kg m^–3 to the south, explains the observed difference between the crustal thicknesses predicted by simple Airy isostasy, and the crustal thicknesses determined by receiver function analysis.

Key Words: Alaska Range • crust • PASSCAL • Mohorovicic discontinuity • isostasy • teleseismic signals

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Rondenay, G. A. Abers, and P. E. van Keken Seismic imaging of subduction zone metamorphism Geology, April 1, 2008; 36(4): 275 - 278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. F. Redfield, D. W. Scholl, P. G. Fitzgerald, and M. E. Beck Jr. Escape tectonics and the extrusion of Alaska: Past, present, and future Geology, November 1, 2007; 35(11): 1039 - 1042. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]