Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; September 2006; v. 34; no. 9; p. 781-784; DOI: 10.1130/G22615.1
© 2006 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Veenstra, E.
Right arrow Articles by Ferris, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Crustal thickness variation in south-central Alaska

Elizabeth Veenstra1, Douglas H. Christensen1, Geoffrey A. Abers2 and Aaron Ferris2

1 Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775-7320, USA
2 Department of Earth Sciences, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA

Crustal thicknesses have been determined by receiver function analysis of broadband teleseismic waveforms recorded during the Broadband Experiment Across the Alaska Range (BEAAR). Typical crust beneath the northern lowlands is 26 km thick, while beneath the mountains it is 35–45 km thick. The transition from thick to thin crust coincides with the location of the Hines Creek fault, a major tectonostratigraphic boundary. Crustal thicknesses determined by receiver functions agree with those predicted from topography assuming Airy type isostasy, suggesting that the Alaska Range is compensated by its crustal root. North of the range, however, the crust is systematically thinner than predicted by simple Airy isostasy. A crustal density contrast of 4.6% across the Hines Creek fault, 2700 kg m–3 to the north and 2830 kg m–3 to the south, explains the observed difference between the crustal thicknesses predicted by simple Airy isostasy, and the crustal thicknesses determined by receiver function analysis.

Key Words: Alaska Range • crust • PASSCAL • Mohorovicic discontinuity • isostasy • teleseismic signals




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeologyHome page
S. Rondenay, G. A. Abers, and P. E. van Keken
Seismic imaging of subduction zone metamorphism
Geology, April 1, 2008; 36(4): 275 - 278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeologyHome page
T. F. Redfield, D. W. Scholl, P. G. Fitzgerald, and M. E. Beck Jr.
Escape tectonics and the extrusion of Alaska: Past, present, and future
Geology, November 1, 2007; 35(11): 1039 - 1042.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America