Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bachmann, O. Articles by Lowenstern, J.B. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Zircon crystallization and recycling in the magma chamber of the rhyolitic Kos Plateau Tuff (Aegean arc)

¹ Section des Sciences de la Terre, Université de Genève, 13, rue des Maraîchers, 1205 Genève, Switzerland
² Department of Earth Sciences, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK
³ MS 910, U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA

In contrast to most large-volume silicic magmas in continental arcs, which are thought to evolve as open systems with significant assimilation of preexisting crust, the Kos Plateau Tuff magma formed dominantly by crystal fractionation of mafic parents. Deposits from this 60 km³ pyroclastic eruption (the largest known in the Aegean arc) lack xenocrystic zircons [secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) U-Pb ages on zircon cores never older than 500 ka] and display Sr-Nd whole-rock isotopic ratios within the range of European mantle in an area with exposed Paleozoic and Tertiary continental crust; this evidence implies a nearly closed-system chemical differentiation. Consequently, the age range provided by zircon SIMS U-Th-Pb dating is a reliable indicator of the duration of assembly and longevity of the silicic magma body above its solidus. The age distribution from 160 ka (age of eruption by sanidine ⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar dating; Smith et al., 1996) to ca. 500 ka combined with textural characteristics (high crystal content, corrosion of most anhydrous phenocrysts, but stability of hydrous phases) suggest (1) a protracted residence in the crust as a crystal mush and (2) rejuvenation (reduced crystallization and even partial resorption of minerals) prior to eruption probably induced by new influx of heat (and volatiles). This extended evolution chemically isolated from the surrounding crust is a likely consequence of the regional geodynamics because the thinned Aegean microplate acts as a refractory container for magmas in the dying Aegean subduction zone (continent-continent subduction).

Key Words: igneous petrology • rhyolite • zircon geochronology • magma residence time • Aegean arc

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. J. N. Wilson and B. L. A. Charlier Rapid Rates of Magma Generation at Contemporaneous Magma Systems, Taupo Volcano, New Zealand: Insights from U-Th Model-age Spectra in Zircons J. Petrology, May 13, 2009; (2009) egp023v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Bachmann and G. W. Bergantz Rhyolites and their Source Mushes across Tectonic Settings J. Petrology, January 7, 2009; (2009) egn068v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. M. Cooper and M. R. Reid Uranium-series Crystal Ages Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2008; 69(1): 479 - 544. [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Bachmann and G. W. Bergantz Deciphering Magma Chamber Dynamics from Styles of Compositional Zoning in Large Silicic Ash Flow Sheets Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2008; 69(1): 651 - 674. [Full Text] [PDF]