Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; October, 2007; v. 35; no. 10; p. 903-906; DOI: 10.1130/G23860A.1
© 2007 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sheldon, H. A.
Right arrow Articles by Micklethwaite, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Damage and permeability around faults: Implications for mineralization

Heather A. Sheldon1 and Steven Micklethwaite2

1 Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Exploration and Mining, P.O. Box 1130, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
2 Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia

Mineral deposits are commonly hosted by small-displacement structures around jogs in major faults, but they are rarely hosted by the major fault itself. This relationship may be explained by time-dependent fracturing and healing in and around major faults and associated permeability evolution. A damage mechanics formulation is used here to explore the spatial-temporal evolution of damage in and around a fault following a fault-slip event. We show that regions of increased damage rate correspond to the location of mineral deposits and that these areas correspond to areas of aftershocks predicted by stress-transfer modeling. The fault itself enters a healing regime following the slip event; hence, it is expected to become less permeable than the fracture network outside the fault. Our results support the hypothesis that mineralization occurs in a fracture network associated with aftershocks; this may be due to the higher time-integrated permeability of the fracture network relative to the main fault.

Key Words: fault • aftershocks • fluid • mineralization • permeability • damage




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
W. Kurz, J. Imber, C. A. J. Wibberley, R. E. Holdsworth, and C. Collettini
The internal structure of fault zones: fluid flow and mechanical properties
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2008; 299(1): 1 - 3.
[Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America