|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
1 Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Exploration and Mining, P.O. Box 1130, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
2 Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
Mineral deposits are commonly hosted by small-displacement structures around jogs in major faults, but they are rarely hosted by the major fault itself. This relationship may be explained by time-dependent fracturing and healing in and around major faults and associated permeability evolution. A damage mechanics formulation is used here to explore the spatial-temporal evolution of damage in and around a fault following a fault-slip event. We show that regions of increased damage rate correspond to the location of mineral deposits and that these areas correspond to areas of aftershocks predicted by stress-transfer modeling. The fault itself enters a healing regime following the slip event; hence, it is expected to become less permeable than the fracture network outside the fault. Our results support the hypothesis that mineralization occurs in a fracture network associated with aftershocks; this may be due to the higher time-integrated permeability of the fracture network relative to the main fault.
Key Words: fault aftershocks fluid mineralization permeability damage
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. Kurz, J. Imber, C. A. J. Wibberley, R. E. Holdsworth, and C. Collettini The internal structure of fault zones: fluid flow and mechanical properties Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2008; 299(1): 1 - 3. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |