Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Vanacker, V. Articles by Kubik, P. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Restoring dense vegetation can slow mountain erosion to near natural benchmark levels

¹ Institute for Mineralogy, University of Hannover, Callinstrasse 3, 30167 Hannover, Germany
² Physical and Regional Geography, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200E, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium
³ Division of Soil and Water Management, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200E, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium
⁴ Paul Scherrer Institute, Institute of Particle Physics, ETH Hoenggerberg, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland

Tropical mountain areas may undergo rapid land degradation as demographic growth and intensified agriculture cause more people to migrate to fragile ecosystems. To assess the extent of the resulting damage, an erosion rate benchmark against which changes in erosion can be evaluated is required. Benchmarks reflecting natural erosion rates are usually not provided by conventional sediment fluxes, which are often biased due to modern land use change, and also miss large, episodic events within the measuring period. To overcome this, we combined three independent assessment tools in the southern Ecuadorian Andes, an area that is severely affected by soil erosion. First, denudation rates from cosmogenic nuclides in river sediment average over time periods of 1–100 k.y. and establish a natural benchmark of only 150 ± 100 t km^–2 yr^–1. Second, we find that land use practices have increased modern sediment yields as derived from reservoir sedimentation rates, which average over periods of 10–100 yr to as much as 15 x 10³ t km^–2 yr^–1. Third, our land cover analysis has shown us that vegetation cover exerts first-order control over present-day erosion rates at the catchment scale. Areas with high vegetation density erode at rates that are characteristically similar to those of the natural benchmark, regardless of whether the type of vegetation is native or anthropogenic. Therefore, our data suggest that even in steep mountain environments sediment fluxes can slow to near their natural benchmark levels with suitable revegetation programs. A set of techniques is now in place to evaluate the effectiveness of erosion mitigation strategies.

Key Words: erosion • vegetation cover • human impact • land use change • cosmogenic nuclides • Andes