Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; April 2007; v. 35; no. 4; p. 319-322; DOI: 10.1130/G23134A.1
© 2007 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glazner, A. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Thermal limitations on incorporation of wall rock into magma

Allen F. Glazner*,1

1 Department of Geological Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3315, USA

Incorporation of solid wall rocks is an oft-cited process in the evolution of magmas, but this process is severely limited by the energy required to dissolve xenoliths. Disaggregation without melting has been proposed as an alternative process for incorporating xenoliths into magma because disaggregation avoids expending the energy required for melting. Analysis of these processes using enthalpy-composition diagrams shows that both processes rapidly lead to high crystal contents in the hybrid magma. For example, incorporation of 25% granite at 400 °C into basalt magma at 1125 °C produces a hybrid magma at 1050 °C with >50% crystals; if the granite disaggregates without melting, the crystal content is 65%–70%. Once the crystal content reaches ~50% the viscosity of the magma is too high to allow further magma movement or xenolith incorporation. Thus, both processes are self-limiting and probably restricted in natural systems to at most a few tens of percent incorporation of xenoliths.

Key Words: magma • thermodynamics • igneous petrology • assimilation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
S. Erdmann, R. A. Jamieson, and M. A. MacDonald
Evaluating the Origin of Garnet, Cordierite, and Biotite in Granitic Rocks: a Case Study from the South Mountain Batholith, Nova Scotia
J. Petrology, August 1, 2009; 50(8): 1477 - 1503.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeosphereHome page
C. G. Barnes, T. Prestvik, Y. Li, L. McCulloch, A. S. Yoshinobu, and C. D. Frost
Growth and zoning of the Hortavaer intrusive complex, a layered alkaline pluton in the Norwegian Caledonides
Geosphere, June 1, 2009; 5(3): 286 - 301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
A. F. Glazner and J. M. Bartley
Reply to comments on "Is stoping a volumetrically significant pluton emplacement process?"
Geological Society of America Bulletin, July 1, 2008; 120(7-8): 1082 - 1087.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
A. Dosseto, S. P. Turner, M. Sandiford, and J. Davidson
Uranium-series isotope and thermal constraints on the rate and depth of silicic magma genesis
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2008; 304(1): 169 - 181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America