Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; June, 2007; v. 35; no. 6; p. 503-506; DOI: 10.1130/G23584A.1
© 2007 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clift, P. D.
Right arrow Articles by Hartley, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Slow rates of subduction erosion and coastal underplating along the Andean margin of Chile and Peru

Peter D. Clift1 and Adrian J. Hartley1

1 Department of Geology and Petroleum Geology, School of Geosciences, Meston Building, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, UK

Marine seismic and drilling data from the Andean margin of Peru and northern Chile show trench retreat and tectonic erosion since at least 20 Ma. However, the onshore coastal zone has undergone modest regional uplift since ca. 2 Ma. This argues against subduction erosion of the margin by steady-state retreat, such as recognized in Tonga or South Sandwich. Instead we identify a new style of slow tectonic erosion. Uplifted forearc sediments indicate underplating of subducted material beneath the base of the coastal forearc, synchronous with tectonic erosion under the trenchward part of the forearc. These observations require slow rates of forearc crust subduction in the region during this time period, averaging no more than 13 km3/m.y./km since 20 Ma as the forearc wedge taper increased. Isostatic volume estimates suggest that as much as 85% of subducted material was underplated under the forearc since 330 ka and does not contribute to crustal growth under the Andes. The switch in tectonic style parallels that in the southern Andes, but cannot be triggered by increased sediment flux to the trench, as proposed for that area.

Key Words: subduction • tectonics • subsidence • sedimentation • Andes • tectonic erosion




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
P. D. Clift, H. Schouten, and P. Vannucchi
Arc-continent collisions, sediment recycling and the maintenance of the continental crust
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2009; 318(1): 75 - 103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
D. W. Scholl and R. von Huene
Implications of estimated magmatic additions and recycling losses at the subduction zones of accretionary (non-collisional) and collisional (suturing) orogens
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2009; 318(1): 105 - 125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America