Quick
Search: 		  
advanced search
 GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help 
Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Geology; September, 2007; v. 35; no. 9; p. 827-830; DOI: 10.1130/G23751A.1
© 2007 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pufahl, P. K.
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, C. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Physical and chemical evidence of the 1850 Ma Sudbury impact event in the Baraga Group, Michigan

Peir K. Pufahl*,1, Eric E. Hiatt2, Clifford R. Stanley3, Jared R. Morrow4, Gabriel J. Nelson5 and Cole T. Edwards6

1 Department of Earth and Environmental Science, Acadia University, Wolfville, Nova Scotia B4P 2R6, Canada
2 Department of Geology, University of Wisconsin, Oshkosh, Wisconsin 54901, USA
3 Department of Earth and Environmental Science, Acadia University, Wolfville, Nova Scotia B4P 2R6, Canada
4 Department of Geological Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, California 92182-1020, USA
5 Department of Earth and Environmental Science, Acadia University, Wolfville, Nova Scotia B4P 2R6, Canada
6 Department of Geology, University of Wisconsin, Oshkosh, Wisconsin 54901, USA

An ejecta layer produced by the Sudbury impact event ca. 1850 Ma occurs within the Baraga Group of northern Michigan and provides an excellent record of impact-related depositional processes. This newly discovered, ~2–4-m-thick horizon accumulated in a peritidal environment during a minor sea-level lowstand that punctuated a period of marine transgression. Common ejecta clasts include shock-metamorphosed quartz grains, splash-form melt spherules and tektites, accretionary lapilli, and glassy shards, suggesting sedimentation near the terminus of the continuous ejecta blanket. Sedimentologic and geochemical data indicate that primary fallout from a turbulent ejecta cloud was reworked to varying degrees by an impact-generated tsunami wave train. Observed platinum group element anomalies (Ir, Rh, and Ru) within the Sudbury ejecta horizon are sufficient to suggest that the impactor was a meteorite. Documenting and interpreting the detailed characteristics of the Sudbury ejecta horizon in Michigan have yielded a fingerprint to identify this chronostratigraphic marker in other Paleoproterozoic basins. For the first time a foundation exists to assess the consequences of the Sudbury impact on Precambrian ocean chemistry and early life.

Key Words: bolide • impact • meteorite • ejecta • sedimentology • platinum group elements • Sudbury • Michigan




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
S. M. Reddy and D. A. D. Evans
Palaeoproterozoic supercontinents and global evolution: correlations from core to atmosphere
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2009; 323(1): 1 - 26.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Economic GeologyHome page
D. E. Ames, A. Davidson, and N. Wodicka
Geology of the Giant Sudbury Polymetallic Mining Camp, Ontario, Canada
Economic Geology, August 1, 2008; 103(5): 1057 - 1077.
[Full Text] [PDF]


JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America