Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; January, 2008; v. 36; no. 1; p. 35-38; DOI: 10.1130/G24285A.1
© 2008 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yoo, K.
Right arrow Articles by Mudd, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Discrepancy between mineral residence time and soil age: Implications for the interpretation of chemical weathering rates

Kyungsoo Yoo*,1 and Simon Marius Mudd*,2

1 University of Delaware, Plant and Soil Sciences Department, Newark, Delaware 19716, USA
2 School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JW, UK

Virtually all soil chronosequence studies have equated the degree of mineral weathering with the soil age, which is equal to the time since the cessation of erosion or deposition. The primary minerals from the parent material, however, enter the soil as the weathering front propagates downward and are depleted via chemical weathering. The residence time of minerals is thus a function of both the rate of conversion of parent material to soil (i.e., soil production) and the minerals' susceptibility to chemical weathering reactions. We find that mineral residence times are significantly shorter than the soil age. By mathematically considering the interactions among soil production and chemical weathering, we demonstrate that traditional estimates of mineral-specific chemical weathering rates from soil chronosequences may diverge by several orders of magnitude from the actual weathering rates.

Key Words: chemical weathering • soil formation • soil production • mineral dissolution




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeologyHome page
E. J. Gabet and S. M. Mudd
A theoretical model coupling chemical weathering rates with denudation rates
Geology, February 1, 2009; 37(2): 151 - 154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
S. L. Brantley and A. F. White
Approaches to Modeling Weathered Regolith
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2009; 70(1): 435 - 484.
[Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America