Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (11) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gerya, T. V. Articles by Yuen, D. A. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Why is terrestrial subduction one-sided?

¹ Department of Earth Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH - Zürich), CH-8092 Zürich, Switzerland
² University of Minnesota Supercomputing Institute and Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455-0219, USA

Subduction of the lithosphere at convergent-plate boundaries takes place asymmetrically—the subducted slab sinks downward, while the overriding plate moves horizontally (one-sided subduction). In contrast, global mantle convection models generally predict downwelling of both plates at convergent margins (two-sided subduction). We carried out two-dimensional (2-D) numerical experiments with a mineralogical-thermomechanical viscoelastic-plastic model to elucidate the cause of one-sided subduction. Our experiments show that the stability, intensity, and mode of subduction depend mainly on slab strength and the amount of weak hydrated rocks present above the slab. Two-sided subduction occurs at low slab strength (sin[] < 0.15, where is effective internal friction angle), regardless of the extent of hydration. In contrast, steady-state one-sided subduction requires a weak hydrated slab interface and high slab strength (sin[] > 0.15). The weak interface is maintained by the release of fluids from the subducted oceanic crust as a consequence of metamorphism. The resulting weak interplate zone localizes deformation at the interface and decouples the strong plates, facilitating asymmetric plate movement. Our work suggests that high plate strength and the presence of water are major factors controlling the style of plate tectonics driven by self-sustaining one-sided subduction processes.

Key Words: subduction zones • water • numerical modeling • slab dehydration • fluid flow

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Bird, Y. Y. Kagan, D. D. Jackson, F. P. Schoenberg, and M. J. Werner Linear and Nonlinear Relations between Relative Plate Velocity and Seismicity Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2009; 99(6): 3097 - 3113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Di Giuseppe, C. Faccenna, F. Funiciello, J. van Hunen, and D. Giardini On the relation between trench migration, seafloor age, and the strength of the subducting lithosphere Lithosphere, April 1, 2009; 1(2): 121 - 128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Willingshofer and D. Sokoutis Decoupling along plate boundaries: Key variable controlling the mode of deformation and the geometry of collisional mountain belts Geology, January 1, 2009; 37(1): 39 - 42. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Brown Metamorphic patterns in orogenic systems and the geological record Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2009; 318(1): 37 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]