Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; October 2008; v. 36; no. 10; p. 755-758; DOI: 10.1130/G24961A.1
© 2008 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gaines, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Yuanlong, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Cambrian Burgess Shale–type deposits share a common mode of fossilization

Robert R. Gaines1, Derek E.G. Briggs2 and Zhao Yuanlong3

1 1 Geology Department, Pomona College, Claremont, California 91711, USA
2 2 Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
3 3 Key Laboratory for Paleobiology, Guizhou University, Guiyang, China

Although Cambrian Burgess Shale–type (BST) biotas are fundamental to understanding the radiation of metazoans, the nature of their extraordinary preservation remains controversial. There remains disagreement about the importance of the role of early mineral replication of soft tissues versus the conservation of primary organic remains. Most prior work focused on soft-bodied fossils from the two most important BST biotas, those of the Burgess Shale (Canada) and Maotianshan Shale (Chengjiang, China). Fossils from these two deposits do not provide ideal candidates for specimen-level taphonomic study because they have been altered: the Burgess Shale by greenschist facies metamorphism and the Maotianshan Shale by intensive subsurface weathering. Elemental mapping of soft-bodied fossils from 11 other BST deposits worldwide demonstrates that BST preservation represents a single major taphonomic pathway that may share a common cause wherever it occurs. The conservation of organic tissues, and not early authigenic mineralization, is the primary mechanism responsible for the preservation of BST assemblages. Early authigenic mineral replacement preserves certain anatomical features of some specimens, but the preservation of non-biomineralized BST fossils requires suppression of the processes that normally lead to the degradation of organic remains in marine environments.

Key Words: taphonomy • Chengjiang • organic preservation • authigenic mineralization




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeologyHome page
A. Page, S. E. Gabbott, P. R. Wilby, and J. A. Zalasiewicz
Ubiquitous Burgess Shale-style "clay templates" in low-grade metamorphic mudrocks
Geology, November 1, 2008; 36(11): 855 - 858.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America