Geology; November 2008; v. 36; no. 11;
p. 835-838; DOI: 10.1130/G25032A.1
© 2008 Geological Society of America
Model for tectonically driven incision of the younger than 6 Ma Grand Canyon
Karl E. Karlstrom1,*,
Ryan Crow1,
L.J. Crossey1,
D. Coblentz2 and
J. W. Van Wijk2
1 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131, USA
2 2Geodynamics Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, 87545, USA
Correspondence: *E-mail: kek1{at}unm.edu.
Accurate models for the incision of the Grand Canyon must include characterization of tectonic influences on incision dynamics such as active faulting and mantle to surface fluid interconnections. These young tectonic features support other geologic data that indicate that the Grand Canyon has been carved in the past 6 Ma. New U-Pb dates on speleothems are reinterpreted here in terms of improved geologic constraints and understanding of the modern aquifer. The combined data suggest that Grand Canyon incision rates have been relatively steady since 3–4 Ma. Differences in rates in the eastern (175–250 m/Ma) and western (50–80 m/Ma) Grand Canyon are explained by Neogene fault block uplift across the Toroweap-Hurricane system. Mantle tomography shows an abrupt step in mantle velocities near the Colorado Plateau edge, and geodynamic modeling suggests that upwelling asthenosphere is driving uplift of the Colorado Plateau margin relative to the Basin and Range. Our model for dynamic surface uplift in the past 6 Ma contrasts with the notion of passive incision of the Grand Canyon due solely to river integration and geomorphic response to base-level fall.
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America