Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; March, 2008; v. 36; no. 3; p. 211-214; DOI: 10.1130/G24346A.1
© 2008 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pelletier, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Kirk, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Recent bright gully deposits on Mars: Wet or dry flow?

Jon D. Pelletier*,1, Kelly J. Kolb2, Alfred S. McEwen2 and Randy L. Kirk3

1 Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA
2 Department of Planetary Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA
3 United States Geological Survey, Astrogeology Program, 2255 N Gemini Drive, Flagstaff, Arizona 86001, USA

Bright gully sediments attributed to liquid water flow have been deposited on Mars within the past several years. To test the liquid water flow hypothesis, we constructed a high-resolution (1 m/pixel) photogrammetric digital elevation model of a crater in the Centauri Montes region, where a bright gully deposit formed between 2001 and 2005. We conducted one-dimensional (1-D) and 2-D numerical flow modeling to test whether the deposit morphology is most consistent with liquid water or dry granular flow. Liquid water flow models that incorporate freezing can match the runout distance of the flow for certain freezing rates but fail to reconstruct the distributary lobe morphology of the distal end of the deposit. Dry granular flow models can match both the observed runout distance and the distal morphology. Wet debris flows with high sediment concentrations are also consistent with the observed morphology because their rheologies are often similar to that of dry granular flows. As such, the presence of liquid water in this flow event cannot be ruled out, but the available evidence is consistent with dry landsliding.

Key Words: Mars • fluvial • mass wasting • numerical model




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Progress in Physical GeographyHome page
S. Tooth
Arid geomorphology: emerging research themes and new frontiers
Progress in Physical Geography, April 1, 2009; 33(2): 251 - 287.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
GeologyHome page
S. C. Schon, J. W. Head, and C. I. Fassett
Unique chronostratigraphic marker in depositional fan stratigraphy on Mars: Evidence for ca. 1.25 Ma gully activity and surficial meltwater origin
Geology, March 1, 2009; 37(3): 207 - 210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America