Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; April 2008; v. 36; no. 4; p. 315-318; DOI: 10.1130/G24474A.1
© 2008 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Panchuk, K.
Right arrow Articles by Kump, L.R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Sedimentary response to Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum carbon release: A model-data comparison

K. Panchuk1, A. Ridgwell2 and L.R. Kump3

1 Department of Geosciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
2 School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, University Road, Bristol BS8 1SS, UK
3 Department of Geosciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA

Possible sources of carbon that may have caused global warming at the Paleocene-Eocene boundary are constrained using an intermediate complexity Earth-system model configured with early Eocene paleogeography. We find that 6800 Pg C ({delta}13C of –22{per thousand}) is the smallest pulse modeled here to reasonably reproduce observations of the extent of seafloor CaCO3 dissolution. This pulse could not have been solely the result of methane hydrate destabilization, suggesting that additional sources of CO2 such as volcanic CO2, the oxidation of sedimentary organic carbon, or thermogenic methane must also have contributed. Observed contrasts in dissolution intensity between Atlantic and Pacific sites are reproduced in the model by reducing bioturbation in the Atlantic during the event, simulating a potential consequence of the spread of low-oxygen bottom waters.

Key Words: Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum • model studies • carbonate compensation depth • methane • volcanism







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Geological Society of America