Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; April 2008; v. 36; no. 4; p. 327-330; DOI: 10.1130/G24408A.1
© 2008 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hayden, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kulpecz, A. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Impact effects and regional tectonic insights: Backstripping the Chesapeake Bay impact structure

Travis Hayden1,*, Michelle Kominz1, David S. Powars2, Lucy E. Edwards2, Kenneth G. Miller3, James V. Browning3 and Andrew A. Kulpecz3

1 Department of Geosciences, Western Michigan University, 1187 Rood Hall, 1903 W. Michigan Avenue, Kalamazoo, Michigan 49008, USA
2 United States Geological Survey, National Center, Reston, Virginia 20192, USA
3 Department of Geosciences, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA

Correspondence: *E-mail: t4hayden{at}wmich.edu.

The Chesapeake Bay impact structure is a ca. 35.4 Ma crater located on the eastern seaboard of North America. Deposition returned to normal shortly after impact, resulting in a unique record of both impact-related and subsequent passive margin sedimentation. We use backstripping to show that the impact strongly affected sedimentation for 7 m.y. through impact-derived crustalscale tectonics, dominated by the effects of sediment compaction and the introduction and subsequent removal of a negative thermal anomaly instead of the expected positive thermal anomaly. After this, the area was dominated by passive margin thermal subsidence overprinted by periods of regional-scale vertical tectonic events, on the order of tens of meters. Loading due to prograding sediment bodies may have generated these events.

Key Words: impact processes • passive margin • Chesapeake Bay • tectonics • Eocene • backstripping




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
G. S. Gohn, C. Koeberl, K. G. Miller, W. U. Reimold, J. V. Browning, C. S. Cockell, J. W. Horton Jr., T. Kenkmann, A. A. Kulpecz, D. S. Powars, et al.
Deep Drilling into the Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure
Science, June 27, 2008; 320(5884): 1740 - 1745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America