Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; May 2008; v. 36; no. 5; p. 427-430; DOI: 10.1130/G24643A.1
© 2008 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crampin, S.
Right arrow Articles by Peacock, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Stress-forecasting (not predicting) earthquakes: A paradigm shift?

Stuart Crampin1,*, Yuan Gao2 and Sheila Peacock3

1 School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JW, UK
2 Institute of Earthquake Science, China Earthquake Administration, 100036 Beijing, China
3 AWE Blacknest, Brimpton, Reading RG7 4RS, UK

Correspondence: *E-mail: scrampin{at}ed.ac.uk

After 120 years of unsuccessful endeavor, a paradigm shift is required before earthquakes can be predicted. The most sensitive diagnostic of low-level changes of stress in in situ rock, variations in microcrack geometry, can be monitored by analyzing shear-wave splitting. The suggested paradigm shift is that, instead of investigating the source zone, we monitor stress accumulation before earthquakes at, possibly, substantial distances from the source. Characteristic temporal variations of shear-wave time delays have been observed in retrospect before 14 earthquakes worldwide. On one occasion, when changes were recognized early enough, the time, magnitude, and fault break of an M = 5 earthquake in southwest Iceland were successfully stress-forecast in a narrow time-magnitude window. Such stress accumulation can be theoretically modeled and is believed to be at least partially understood. When sufficient shear-wave source earthquakes are available, increasing time delays also show an abrupt decrease shortly before the impending earthquake occurs. This is not fully understood but is thought to be caused by stress relaxation as microcracks coalesce onto the eventual fault break. The new result confirming these ideas, and justifying the paradigm shift, is that logarithms of the durations of both increases and decreases in time delays are found to be proportional (self-similar) to the magnitudes of impending earthquakes.

Key Words: stress accumulation • paradigm shift • shear-wave splitting • stress-forecasting earthquakes




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeologyHome page
C. Chiarabba, P. De Gori, and E. Boschi
Pore-pressure migration along a normal-fault system resolved by time-repeated seismic tomography
Geology, January 1, 2009; 37(1): 67 - 70.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America