Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; July 2008; v. 36; no. 7; p. 539-542; DOI: 10.1130/G24638A.1
© 2008 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Medvedev, S.
Right arrow Articles by Podladchikov, Y. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Vertical motions of the fjord regions of central East Greenland: Impact of glacial erosion, deposition, and isostasy

Sergei Medvedev1, Ebbe H. Hartz2 and Yuri Y. Podladchikov3

1 Physics of Geological Processes, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway
2 Physics of Geological Processes, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway, and Aker Exploration, Haakon VII'gt 9, 4005 Stavanger, Norway
3 Physics of Geological Processes, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway

The origin of the vertical motions of East Greenland is a longstanding enigma. The area is characterized by a mountain chain >1000 km long, wherein the high peaks (2.5–3.7 km elevation) reside above a relatively thin crust (30–35 km). These mountains contain Mesozoic marine sediments uplifted to 1.2 km during the tectonic quietness of the middle to late Cenozoic. This uplifted area is cut by some of the world's biggest fjords. Scoresbysund fjord is as wide as 60 km, and cuts 400 km into the land and more than 4 km down from the peaks of the region. We test the potential amount of regional uplift and subsidence caused by the fjords' incision and associated deposition of sediments offshore. These tests are based on modeling the erosion process backward in time. The fjords are filled back to the summit surface while similar weights of sediments are removed from the shelf. The model considers the isostatic response of the lithosphere due to the loading and unloading of bedrock, sediments, water, and ice. Our estimates show that an average of almost 1.2 km of bedrock was eroded in the region from the middle Cenozoic summit surface. Most of the erosional products were deposited on the continental shelf outside the mouth of the fjords. Our calculations demonstrate that rocks in the central Fjord Mountains may be uplifted as much as 1.1 km due to the erosional unloading and flexural isostatic effects. Thus these effects should present a main part of the mechanisms responsible for the Cenozoic uplift in central East Greenland. Because the North Atlantic is rimmed by young glacially carved mountain chains, the model may be applicable to other parts of the area.

Key Words: glacial erosion • isostasy • Greenland • numerical modeling




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeologyHome page
J. D. Pelletier
Glacial erosion and mountain building
Geology, July 1, 2008; 36(7): 591 - 592.
[Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America