Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; September 2008; v. 36; no. 9; p. 675-678; DOI: 10.1130/G24728A.1
© 2008 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blum, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lancaster, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Ups and downs of the Mississippi Delta

Michael D. Blum*,1, Jonathan H. Tomkin2, Anthony Purcell3 and Robin R. Lancaster1

1 1Department of Geology and Geophysics, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA
2 2Department of Geology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA
3 3Research School of Earth Sciences, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia

Correspondence: *E-mail: mike{at}geol.lsu.edu.

During the last glacial period, when sea level was low, meltwater discharge drove incision of the lower Mississippi valley, with valley filling and delta construction during Holocene sea-level rise. Isostatic modeling shows that sediment volumes removed and replaced were sufficient to induce uplift of >9 m along valley margins followed by subsidence of the same magnitude, with effects dissipating only over distances of >100–150 km along the Gulf of Mexico coast. Recognition of cyclical uplift and subsidence refutes recent interpretations of delta stability, and suggests that late Holocene relative sea-level curves from the delta region are instead a record of subsidence of the pre-Holocene depocenter. More broadly, incised valley cutting and filling is a common fluvial response to glacioeustasy, and cyclical uplift and subsidence should be common to large alluvial-deltaic systems elsewhere.

Key Words: Mississippi delta • incised valley • isostatic uplift and subsidence • Holocene sea-level change




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
A. R. Simms, N. Aryal, Y. Yokoyama, H. Matsuzaki, and R. Dewitt
Insights on a Proposed Mid-Holocene Highstand Along the Northwestern Gulf of Mexico from the Evolution of Small Coastal Ponds
Journal of Sedimentary Research, October 1, 2009; 79(10): 757 - 772.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeologyHome page
S. Mazzotti, A. Lambert, M. Van der Kooij, and A. Mainville
Impact of anthropogenic subsidence on relative sea-level rise in the Fraser River delta
Geology, September 1, 2009; 37(9): 771 - 774.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Progress in Physical GeographyHome page
R. Edwards
Sea levels: science and society
Progress in Physical Geography, October 1, 2008; 32(5): 557 - 574.
[PDF]


Home page
GeologyHome page
J. P. Donnelly and L. Giosan
Tempestuous highs and lows in the Gulf of Mexico
Geology, September 1, 2008; 36(9): 751 - 752.
[Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America