Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; September 2008; v. 36; no. 9; p. 695-698; DOI: 10.1130/G24909A.1
© 2008 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bosworth, W.
Right arrow Articles by Burke, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Cyrenaican "shock absorber" and associated inversion strain shadow in the collision zone of northeast Africa

William Bosworth1, Ahmed S. El-Hawat2, Daniel E. Helgeson1 and Kevin Burke3

1 1Apache Egypt Companies, 11, Street 281, New Maadi, Cairo, Egypt
2 2University of Garyounis, P.O. Box 1308, Binghazi, Libya
3 3Department of Geosciences, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204, USA

Far-field compressional stresses resulting from arc collisions with the northeast coast of Africa-Arabia propagated across the African plate in the Santonian (ca. 84 Ma), and later similar pulses occurred through much of the Cenozoic. Waves of inversion-related features including folds, thrusts, and igneous activity developed during the compressional events. Structures generated were uneven in intensity and distribution, and were commonly concentrated in existing rifts. Because of the irregular shapes of the North African continental margin and associated inboard basins, Cyrenaica underwent the most severe shortening, although deformation extended eastward from Libya to the Levant. Areas south and southeast of Cyrenaica (the Sirt Basin and the far Western Desert of Egypt) underwent very little shortening because they occupied a regional strain shadow. The eastern region of the Western Desert and Sinai, which were not sheltered by the stress-absorbing Cyrenaica inversion, recorded strong compressional deformation synchronous with that in Cyrenaica. As closure of the Mediterranean continues, Cyrenaica will become an indenter comparable to those of other orogenic belts. The detailed tectonic evolution of individual northeast African basins has depended on their positions in relation to the Cyrenaican strain shadow. No single subsidence and paleostress history reflects the complete regional development of the converging Mediterranean–North African margin.

Key Words: northeast Africa • inversion • promontory • indenter • Libya • Egypt • Cyrenaica • Sirt • Western Desert • Eastern Mediterranean







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America