Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Dixon, J. L. Articles by Amundson, R. GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Climate-driven processes of hillslope weathering

¹ School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, 548 Physical Sciences F-wing, Tempe, Arizona 85287, USA
² Department of Geology, College of William and Mary, 217 McGlothlin-Street Hall, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187, USA
³ Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California–Berkeley, 137 Mulford Hall, Berkeley, California 94720, USA

Correspondence: *E-mails: jean.dixon{at}asu.edu; arjun.heimsath{at}asu.edu; jmkaste{at}wm.edu; earthy{at}nature.berkeley.edu (Amundson).

Climate controls erosion and weathering on soil-mantled landscapes through diverse processes that have remained difficult to disentangle due to their complex interactions. We quantify denudation, soil and saprolite weathering, and soil transport near the base and crest of the western slope of the Sierra Nevada to examine how large differences in climate affect these processes. Depth profiles of fallout radionuclides and field observations show relative differences in erosion and weathering processes at these two climatically diverse sites, and our data suggest fundamentally different patterns of soil production and transport mechanisms: biotically driven soil transport at low elevation, and surface erosion driven by overland flow at high elevation. Soil production rates from cosmogenic ¹⁰Be decrease from 31.3 to 13.6 m/Ma with increasing soil depth at low elevation, but show uncertain depth dependence at the high elevation site. Our data also show a positive correlation between physical erosion and saprolite weathering at both sites. Highly weathered saprolites are overlain by weakly weathered and rapidly eroding soils, while chemically less depleted saprolites are overlain by slowly eroding, more weathered soils. Our data are among the first to quantify the critical role of saprolite weathering in the evolution of actively eroding upland landscapes, and our results provide quantitative constraints on how different climates can shape hillslopes by driving processes of erosion and weathering.