Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; November 2009; v. 37; no. 11; p. 995-998; DOI: 10.1130/G30172A.1
© 2009 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MacInnes, B. T.
Right arrow Articles by Kravchunovskaya, E. A.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Tsunami geomorphology: Erosion and deposition from the 15 November 2006 Kuril Island tsunami

Breanyn T. MacInnes1,*, Joanne Bourgeois1, Tatiana K. Pinegina2 and Ekaterina A. Kravchunovskaya2

1 Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
2 Institute of Volcanology and Seismology, Far Eastern Branch Russian Academy of Sciences, 683006 Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskiy, Russia

Correspondence: *E-mail: macinneb{at}u.washington.edu.

The 15 November 2006 Kuril earthquake (Mw 8.1–8.4) and tsunami enabled us to collect a compelling data set of coastal geomorphic change in the Kuril Islands from ~3 months before to 9 (and 21) months after the tsunami. Our pre-tsunami and post-tsunami surveys of the islands, including four topographic profiles measured in 2006 and reoccupied in 2007, allow us the confidence to attribute many changes to the tsunami, in spite of an absence of eyewitness accounts in the central islands. Areas with low runup, <8 m, underwent limited geomorphic change, primarily confined to beach or stream channels. Regions with high runup, >15 m, underwent massive erosion that dramatically altered the coastline. Tsunami deposits roughly corresponded with the extent of tsunami runup and inundation. The amount of sediment eroded by the tsunami far outweighed the amount deposited on land in all cases studied. The tsunami was dominantly erosive in the Kuril Islands because the high-relief topography of the coastline accelerated tsunami outflow.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America