Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; March 2009; v. 37; no. 3; p. 223-226; DOI: 10.1130/G25439A.1
© 2009 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Valley, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Whitehouse, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Direct dating of Fe oxide-(Cu-Au) mineralization by U/Pb zircon geochronology

Peter M. Valley1,*, John M. Hanchar1 and Martin J. Whitehouse2

1Department of Earth Sciences, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland A1B 3X5, Canada
2Laboratory for Isotope Geology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden

Correspondence: *E-mail: pvalley{at}mun.ca.

We present results for direct dating of Fe oxide-(Cu-Au) (iron oxide, copper, gold—IOCG) mineralization by U/Pb zircon geochronology. Constraining the timing of mineralization has important geodynamic implications for the processes involved in the genesis of these types of deposits and the tectonic evolution of rocks associated with these deposits. Hydrothermal zircon crystals were separated from four IOCG-type ore deposits associated with the Lyon Mountain Granite in the Adirondack Mountains, United States. Zircon grains from these low-Ti magnetite deposits reveal at least two periods of mineralization; one episode ca. 1039 Ma and a second between ca. 1015 and 1000 Ma. Previous age determinations of these deposits were constrained by the age of the altered host granitoids, and the assumption that Fe mineralization was directly related to pluton emplacement. Zircon crystals extracted from the ore yield ages that show that ore mineralization was episodic and younger than pluton emplacement.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America