Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bourgeois, J. Articles by Weiss, R. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

"Chevrons" are not mega-tsunami deposits—A sedimentologic assessment

¹Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
²Department of Geology & Geophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA

Since the introduction of the term "chevron" for large v- or u-shaped bed forms in Egypt and the Bahamas, others have adopted the term to describe large-scale coastal bed forms in Australia, Madagascar, and elsewhere. These authors interpret "chevron" bed forms as deposits of mega-tsunamis resulting from Holocene oceanic asteroid impacts. We reason that chevron-type bed forms are common and are present far enough from the coast to preclude tsunami genesis. Moreover, we argue that "chevrons" are not mega-tsunami deposits by modeling tsunami behavior and evaluating sediment-transport conditions under which such features formed. We model the southern Madagascar case, with an impact source in the Indian Ocean, and show that a modeled wave approach is inconsistent with "chevron" orientation. We then evaluate sediment-transport conditions under which these "chevron" bed forms could persist, i.e., bed-load transport. In our analysis, no conditions specified generate pure bed-load transport, and most result in pure suspended-load transport.