Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; July 2009; v. 37; no. 7; p. 587-590; DOI: 10.1130/G25511A.1
© 2009 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sømme, T. O.
Right arrow Articles by Granjeon, D.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Impact of eustatic amplitude variations on shelf morphology, sediment dispersal, and sequence stratigraphic interpretation: Icehouse versus greenhouse systems

Tor O. Sømme1, William Helland-Hansen1,2 and Didier Granjeon3

1 Department of Earth Science, University of Bergen, Allégaten 41, 5007 Bergen, Norway
2 The University Centre in Svalbard, P.O. Box 156, 9171 Longyearbyen, Norway
3 Institut Français du Pétrole, 1–4 Avenue de Bois-Préau, 92852 Rueil-Malmaison Cedex, France

The Pliocene–Pleistocene icehouse stratigraphic record is characterized by distinct sediment distribution patterns and chronostratigraphic relationships resulting from high-frequency, high-amplitude changes in sea level. These modern relationships are often used as a template for sequence stratigraphic interpretation and for predicting sediment distribution in ancient greenhouse systems, deposited at times when sea-level fluctuations are known to have been different from the most recent period of geologic time. Numerical modeling suggests that the depth of the shelf rollover, and thereby also shelf accommodation, rapidly adapts to changes in eustatic amplitude along passive, constructional sedimentary margins. Lower amplitudes and perhaps also lower frequencies during greenhouse periods would allow across-shelf delta progradation and sediment delivery to the slope and basin floor during both third- and fourth-order highstands. Care should therefore be taken when extrapolating stratigraphic models between icehouse and greenhouse systems.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America