Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; July 2009; v. 37; no. 7; p. 611-614; DOI: 10.1130/G25550A.1
© 2009 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bopp, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Glessner, J. J.G.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Variations in 238U/235U in uranium ore deposits: Isotopic signatures of the U reduction process?

Charles John Bopp, IV1, Craig C. Lundstrom1, Thomas M. Johnson1 and Justin J.G. Glessner1

1 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Geology, 245 Natural History Building, 1301 West Green Street, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA

The ability to measure 238U/235U to high precision presents an important new opportunity to study the fate and transport of uranium in the environment. The ratio of 238U/235U was determined by multicollector–inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometer in six uranium ore samples representing two different classes of deposits. Significant offsets in 238U/235U are observed between uranium ores precipitated from groundwaters at low temperature versus hydrothermal deposits precipitated at high temperatures, reinforcing an observation made previously but lacking the needed precision. Specifically, tabular sandstone-type uranium deposits were found to be depleted in 235U, with a total offset between low-temperature deposits and higher temperature deposits of {approx}1.0{per thousand}. We attribute this offset to reflect a temperature-dependent fractionation related to the nuclear field shift effect during chemical reduction of uranium in ambient temperature groundwaters.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America