Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; July 2009; v. 37; no. 7; p. 659-662; DOI: 10.1130/G25653A.1
© 2009 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dessa, J.-X.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Megathrust earthquakes can nucleate in the forearc mantle: Evidence from the 2004 Sumatra event

J.-X. Dessa1, F. Klingelhoefer2, D. Graindorge3, C. André3, H. Permana4, M.-A. Gutscher3, A. Chauhan5, S. C. Singh5 and the SUMATRA-OBS Scieic Team

1 GéoAzur, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, CNRS-IRD-UNS, 2 quai de la Darse, BP 48, F-06235 Villefranche-sur-Mer, France
2 IFREMER, BP 70, F-29280 Plouzané, France
3 Institut Universitaire Européen de la Mer (UBO), Technopôle Brest-Iroise, Place Nicolas Copernic, F-29280 Plouzané, France
4 Research Center for Geotechnology-LIPI, Bandung, 40135, Indonesia
5 Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, 4 place Jussieu, F-75252, Paris, France

Current models predict that the seismogenic zone along subduction thrusts, where the largest earthquakes nucleate and propagate, does not extend to the forearc mantle below the crust of the upper plate. Stable sliding conditions have been shown to prevail there, particularly along several circum-Pacific margins that underwent great megathrust earthquakes (Mw > 8.5) during the twentieth century. Based on geophysical investigation, we show that the great 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake (Mw = 9–9.3) contradicts these models: not only did it propagate downdip along the interface between the forearc mantle and the subducting plate, but it actually nucleated along this reportedly aseismic part of the interplate contact. Petrological models can therefore underestimate the downdip extent of rupture zones to be expected in megathrust earthquakes, and need to be revised to account for this observation, albeit unusual.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America