Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; October 1978; v. 6; no. 10; p. 587-591; DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(1978)6<587:HGTOC>2.0.CO;2
© 1978 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Drake, E. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Horse genealogy: The Oregon connection

Ellen T. Drake1

1 School of Oceanography, Departments of English and General Science Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331

The deciphering of the genealogy of the horse demonstrating Darwin's theory of evolution was the brilliant work of Othniel C. Marsh of Yale that established his reputation not only in vertebrate paleontology but in the entire scientific world. Without the pioneer efforts of Thomas Condon, first State Geologist of Oregon, however, Marsh could not have accomplished this coup in his frenzied race with his arch rival, Edward D. Cope, for scientific priority and the amassing of fossil bones.

Condon discovered in the John Day country of Oregon many specimens of new species that provided Marsh with invaluable links in the evolutionary progression. Marsh refused to return specimens which Condon loaned to him in 1871. The fossils were finally returned to Oregon in 1906, years after Marsh's death; although now mostly scattered or lost, they were discovered to include at least one specimen of Miohippus, an important link in horse evolution. Miohippus was a genus unknown before Marsh described it in his 1874 article in which he announced that he had identified the direct line of descent of the horse. Marsh never credited Condon with this discovery. The Condon story is perhaps a demonstration of the plight of the lone scientist outside the Establishment.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America