Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; March 2008; v. 36; no. 3; p. 199-202; DOI: 10.1130/G24554A.1
© 2008 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Donato, S.V.
Right arrow Articles by Vosmer, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Identifying tsunami deposits using bivalve shell taphonomy

S.V. Donato1, E.G. Reinhardt1, J.I. Boyce1, R. Rothaus2 and T. Vosmer3

1 School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada
2 Saint Cloud State University, 720 Fourth Avenue South, Saint Cloud, Minnesota 56301, USA
3 Office of the Adviser to His Majesty the Sultan for Cultural Affairs, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman


Figure 01
View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Geographic location of study area relative to the Makran subduction zone and 28 November 1945 earthquake epicenter.

 

Figure 02
View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Digital elevation model of Sur Lagoon created using Geosoft OasisTM software. Data points collected during walking survey of the lagoon (using Trimble R3 survey device) on transect lines spaced 100 m apart. Offshore bathymetric data were collected by echo sounder and adjusted to fit lagoon topographic data. Depth and elevation are shown as meters relative to mean sea level (m.s.l.). Spot elevations in meters above sea level and land contour lines shown for 10 and 20 m. Core and beach collection localities indicated by triangles. Sand spit is stippled section west of lagoon entrance.

 

Figure 03
View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Core lithology plotted north to south with the tsunami horizon correlated between cores with dashed lines. Elevations of core tops are relative to mean sea level. Thin upper shell beds in cores 1 and 7 represent recent burial events (<15 yr).

 

Figure 04
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Mean taphonomic values with 1{sigma} standard deviation.

 

Figure 05
View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. A: Percentage of articulated specimens recovered at each sample site based on their habitat (as described in Bosch et al., 1995). No articulated specimens were recovered from sites 6 (lower and upper), 8, and B2 and B3. B: Percentage of identifiable bivalves (disarticulated valves and articulated specimens) recovered from core and beach sites. Ecotope designations after Bosch et al. (1995).

 

Figure 06
View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 6. Scenario for stratigraphic development of the tsunami horizon within Sur Lagoon.

 





JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Geological Society of America