Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; March 2009; v. 37; no. 3; p. 203-206; DOI: 10.1130/G25261A.1
© 2009 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pickering, K. T.
Right arrow Articles by Bayliss, N. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Deconvolving tectono-climatic signals in deep-marine siliciclastics, Eocene Ainsa basin, Spanish Pyrenees: Seesaw tectonics versus eustasy

Kevin T. Pickering1 and Nicole J. Bayliss1

1 Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK


Figure 01
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Location and generalized revised stratigraphy of the Ainsa-Jaca basin (after Das Gupta and Pickering, 2008): TS—turbidite system.

 

Figure 02
View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Eight sandy systems (>60% sand) are recognized in the deep-marine Ainsa basin, containing 24 sandbodies or channelized submarine fans, that were deposited in various deep-marine settings, which from the oldest are: (1) Fosado (two sandbodies)—lower-slope erosional channels; (2) Los Molinos (three sandbodies)—lower-slope erosional channels; (3) Arro (three sandbodies)—canyon/base-of-slope channel system; (4) Gerbe (two sandbodies)—canyon/lower-slope erosional channels; (5) Banaston (six sandbodies)—base-of-slope erosional channel and proximal basin-floor confined/channel system, but previously interpreted as a canyon system; (6) Ainsa (three sandbodies)—lower-slope erosional channels and proximal basin-floor channelized fans; (7) Morillo (three sandbodies)—base-of-slope erosional channels and proximal basin-floor confined/channel system, but previously interpreted as a canyon system canyon/base-of-slope erosional channel system; and (8) Guaso (two sandbodies)—structurally-confined, low-gradient, clastic ramp. For the Banaston, Ainsa, and Morillo systems, the base-of-slope appears to have coincided broadly with the present-day Rio Cinca and Mediano reservoir.

Map compiled from detailed maps of individual systems with best-fit and, therefore, not accurate for topographic maps or aerial photographs.

 

Figure 03
View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Schematic interpretation of sedimentary environments in sandy systems (e.g., Banastón, Ainsa, and Morillo), in this case, drawn for the Ainsa system. MTC—mass transport complex.

 

Figure 04
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Summary explanation of evolution of deep-marine sandy systems in the Ainsa basin. Approximate duration of sandy systems is based on ~400 k.y. cyclicity for ~25 sand-bodies and associated fine-grained deposits (channelized submarine fans and interfan deposits) (after Heard et al., 2008).

 





JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America