Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Geology Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geology; March 2009; v. 37; no. 3; p. 211-214; DOI: 10.1130/G25413A.1
© 2009 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Katayama, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Thin anisotropic layer in the mantle wedge beneath northeast Japan

Ikuo Katayama1,*

1 Department of Earth and Planetary Systems Science, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan


Figure 01
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Deformation mechanism map for olivine as function of stress and temperature at pressure, P = 2 GPa, grain size, d, of 1.0 mm, and water content, COH = 1000 ppm H/Si. Thick lines represent transition between diffusion and dislocation mechanisms, and dashed line is transition between climb-controlled power-law creep and glide-controlled Peierls mechanism. Constant strain rate curves of 10–5, 10–10, and 10–15 s–1 are shown as thin gray lines.

 

Figure 02
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Strength envelope for lithospheric mantle calculated at a strain rate of 10–14 s–1, water content, COH = 1000 ppm H/Si, and the geotherm of McKenzie et al. (2005). Strength is controlled by frictional sliding at shallow depth and by plastic flow at greater depths.

 

Figure 03
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Distribution of anisotropic layer (dark gray region) in mantle wedge beneath northeast Japan, as inferred from dominant deformation mechanisms. Thermal structure is taken from Peacock (2003), and stress contours are calculated from the rate-controlling flow law assuming a strain rate of 10–14 s–1, grain size of 1.0 mm, and water content, COH = 1000 ppm H/Si. Deformation throughout most of mantle wedge occurs via diffusion creep: anisotropic region dominated by dislocation creep is limited to thin layer located above subducting slab and beneath island arc crust.

 

Figure 04
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Relation between shear-wave delay time and thickness of anisotropic layer. If we employ strength of anisotropy based on results of experiments on olivine aggregates (Katayama and Karato, 2006), observed delay times of shear waves beneath northeast Japan (0.06–0.26 s; Nakajima and Hasegawa, 2004) can be explained by an anisotropic layer in mantle wedge with thickness of ~5–25 km. AVs—anisotropy for a specific propagation direction; <Vs>—average velocity of the fast and slow velocities.

 





JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America