Subduction zones are one of the most important sites of chemical interchange between the Earth’s surface and interior. One means of explaining the high Fe3+/ΣFe ratios and oxidized nature of primary arc magmas is the transfer of sulfate (SOX), carbonate (CO3–), and/or iron (Fe3+) bearing fluids from the slab to the overlying mantle. Iron mobility and Fe stable isotope fractionation in fluids are influenced by Fe redox state and the presence of chlorine and/or sulfur anions. Here we use Fe stable isotopes (δ56Fe) as a tracer of iron mobility in serpentinites from Western Alps metaophiolites, which represent remnants of oceanic lithosphere that have undergone subduction-related metamorphism and devolatilization. A negative correlation (R2 = 0.72) is observed between serpentinite bulk δ56Fe and Fe3+/ΣFe that provides the first direct evidence for the release of Fe-bearing fluids during serpentinite devolatilization in subduction zones. The progressive loss of isotopically light Fe from the slab with increasing degree of prograde metamorphism is consistent with the release of sulfate-rich and/or hypersaline fluids, which preferentially complex isotopically light Fe in the form of Fe(II)-SOX or Fe(II)-Cl2 species. Fe isotopes can therefore be used as a tracer of the nature of slab-derived fluids.
Magmas erupted at subduction zones display high ratios of oxidized to total iron (Fe3+/ΣFe) and are enriched in volatiles relative to other mantle-derived magmas (e.g., Kelley and Cottrell, 2009). It has therefore been suggested that the source region of arc magmas has been modified by oxidized and volatile-rich fluids released from the subducting slab. Possible oxidizing agents include sulfate- and/or carbonate-bearing fluids derived from subducted sediments or serpentinites (Kelley and Cottrell, 2009; Frezzotti et al., 2011; Evans, 2012; Debret et al., 2014a, 2015), as well as Fe3+ transferred directly via supercritical fluids and brines (Mungall, 2002; Kelley and Cottrell, 2009), which have been shown to mobilize other trivalent, normally fluid-immobile elements (Kessel et al., 2005). Evidence in support of direct Fe3+ and/or SO42– transfer includes positive correlations between Fe3+/ΣFe and trace element ratios indicative of slab-derived fluids (e.g., Ba/La) in arc magma melt inclusions (Kelley and Cottrell, 2009).
The devolatilization of serpentinite within the subducting slab and the fluids released play a fundamental role in mantle wedge redox evolution (Evans, 2012) and arc magma genesis (Spandler and Pirard, 2013). At mid-oceanic ridges or oceanic-continent transition zones, serpentinites are formed by the hydration and oxidation of the oceanic lithosphere, which leads to the replacement of olivine (Ol) and orthopyroxene by Fe3+-rich lizardite, which contains as much as 13% water, and magnetite, increasing bulk-rock Fe3+/ΣFe (e.g., Andreani et al., 2013; Klein et al., 2014). During subduction, the lizardite (Liz, low-temperature form of serpentine) to antigorite (Atg, high-temperature form of serpentine) transition is accompanied by magnetite dissolution and a decrease in serpentine mineral Fe3+/ΣFe (Schwartz et al., 2013; Debret et al., 2014a). At higher pressures and temperatures, antigorite breakdown to secondary olivine results in the loss of H2O (e.g., Ulmer and Trommsdorff, 1995) and the growth of other Fe2+-rich minerals (Debret et al., 2015). The major consequence of serpentinite prograde metamorphism during subduction is thus a net decrease in bulk-rock Fe3+/ΣFe. It is, however, unknown whether this reflects (1) the direct loss of Fe3+ during prograde metamorphism and/or (2) the oxidation and loss of other redox-sensitive species (e.g., SO42–) to the mantle wedge.
To date there has been no direct means of tracing the loss of oxidizing components or Fe from the subducting slab and their transfer to the mantle wedge (Evans, 2012). New tools that can be used to trace and quantify the mobility of Fe during subduction-related devolatilization and metamorphism are thus required. Iron stable isotopes can serve as such a tracer, as significant isotopic variations can only be achieved by either the addition or loss of Fe-bearing components. Theory predicts that stable isotope variations will be driven by changes in oxidation state, coordination, and bonding environment (Polyakov and Mineev, 2000; Fujii et al., 2011), in particular for Fe the presence of Cl– and SO42– anions (Hill et al., 2010). Here we explore the mobility of Fe during slab devolatilization with a Fe stable isotope study of subducted serpentinites from Western Alps metaophiolites. We show a striking negative correlation between the Fe isotope compositions (δ56Fe) of serpentinites and bulk-rock Fe3+/ΣFe, providing the first direct evidence for the open-system behavior of iron in serpentinites during subduction-related prograde metamorphism.
SELECTED SAMPLES AND RESULTS
Alpine metaophiolites are interpreted as remnants of oceanic lithosphere formed and serpentinized in magma-poor settings before being metamorphosed and devolatilized at various pressure-temperature (P-T) conditions during subduction (Fig. 1A; e.g., Hattori and Guillot, 2007; Debret et al., 2013). We selected a set of 29 representative serpentinite samples encompassing the full range of prograde metamorphic grades for this study (Table DR1 and Fig. DR1 in the GSA Data Repository1). These samples have been characterized in previous petrological and geochemical studies (Schwartz et al., 2013; Debret et al., 2013; Lafay et al., 2013). They display the progressive replacement of lizardite by antigorite (Atg/Liz- to Atg-serpentinites; Fig. 1A), and the first stages of serpentinite dehydration at eclogite facies (Ol/Atg-serpentinites). The Atg-serpentinites are characterized by low amounts of magnetite relative to Atg/Liz-serpentinites (Debret et al., 2014a) and can display equilibrated hematite-magnetite assemblages (Fig. DR2). The Ol/Atg-serpentinites are generally present as metamorphic veins and shear zones composed of olivine and antigorite, and are interpreted as high-permeability reaction zones where the fluids released during serpentinite devolatilization have been localized (Debret et al., 2013). For reference we also analyzed a suite of Alpine slightly serpentinized peridotites (SSP), unmetamorphosed lizardite (Liz-) serpentinites, and abyssal serpentinites, which are considered to be representative of the presubduction lithospheric hydrated mantle. No retrograde phases (e.g., talc, chrysotile, amphibole) are observed in the studied sample suite, suggesting that the samples are poorly affected by retrograde metamorphism.
Bulk-rock Fe isotope (δ56Fe), Fe3+/ΣFe, and trace element concentration data for the studied serpentinites are reported in Tables DR1 and DR2. There is a progressive increase in serpentinite δ56Fe value with metamorphic grade (Fig. 1; Fig. DR3): the mean δ56Fe value of the Atg-serpentinites (+0.08‰ ± 0.11‰, 2 standard deviations, sd) and Atg/Liz-serpentinites (+0.07‰ ± 0.07‰) is greater than that of the Liz-serpentinites (δ56Fe = −0.02‰ ± 0.14‰), SSP (δ56Fe = −0.03‰ ± 0.15‰), and abyssal serpentinites (δ56Fe = −0.05‰ ± 0.07‰, this study; δ56Fe = +0.01‰ ± 0.08‰, Craddock et al., 2013). Furthermore, Fe isotopes are negatively correlated with serpentinite Fe3+/ΣFe (Fig. 2), suggesting that prograde metamorphism in serpentinite and the associated decrease in Fe3+/ΣFe is accompanied with the release of a low-δ56Fe fluid. In contrast, the eclogite facies Ol/Atg-serpentinites are characterized by lower δ56Fe values (δ56Fe = −0.03‰ ± 0.06‰).
Although the progressive increase in δ56Fe during prograde metamorphism is suggestive of open-system behavior of iron during slab devolatilization, several processes must be first taken into account. These are (1) the mobility of Fe and associated isotopic fractionation during the initial ocean-floor serpentinization of lithosphere, and (2) preexisting protolith Fe isotope heterogeneity. The Liz-serpentinites display a broad range in δ56Fe values, which range from −0.098‰ to +0.047‰ and are similar to those of SSP, which range from −0.069‰ to +0.063‰. Both sets of values overlap with the δ56Fe values of abyssal serpentinites (−0.094‰ to +0.108‰; Craddock et al., 2013), and may be considered representative of presubduction oceanic lithosphere. It is important that, while ridge-axis serpentinization processes are known to increase Fe3+/ΣFe (Evans, 2008), the δ56Fe values of oxidized and hydrous Liz-serpentinites are similar to those of the comparatively reduced and anhydrous SSP and are uncorrelated with Fe3+/ΣFe (Fig. DR4). This suggests that Fe behaves conservatively during ocean-floor serpentinization and that no appreciable Fe stable isotope fractionation takes place during this process. Previous studies have demonstrated that a relationship between bulk δ56Fe values and rock fertility exists, with pyroxene-rich and less depleted peridotites displaying isotopically heavier compositions (Williams et al., 2005). In Alpine ophiolites, serpentinite protolith fertility can be assessed using fluid-immobile elements poorly affected by serpentinization (e.g., Al2O3/SiO2, Zr/Nb; Bodinier and Godard, 2013). As illustrated in Figure 3, the δ56Fe values of Alpine Liz-serpentinites and SSP form broad positive arrays with Al2O3/SiO2 and Zr/Nb, which provide evidence for some level of source fertility control on protolith δ56Fe. Similar correlations between the δ56Fe values of Atg/Liz- or Atg-serpentinites and indices of peridotite fertility are present, but are demonstrably offset to overall heavier δ56Fe values (Fig. 3).
The comparatively heavy δ56Fe values of the Atg/Liz- and Atg-serpentinites relative to the SSP and Liz-serpentinites and the correlation between bulk serpentinite δ56Fe and Fe3+/ΣFe (Fig. 2) must therefore relate to the loss or addition of Fe-bearing fluids during prograde metamorphism. Sediment dehydration releases a significant amount of fluids and volatiles that can potentially interact with serpentinites and modify their isotopic signatures during subduction (Deschamps et al., 2010). However, no correlations between δ56Fe and elemental tracers of sediment-serpentinite interaction (e.g., As, Sb, Cs) are present (Fig. DR5), suggesting that interactions between sediment-derived melts or fluids and serpentinites cannot explain the heavy δ56Fe values of the Atg/Liz- and Atg-serpentinites. Furthermore, sediment melting requires an elevated subduction geotherm (e.g., Bouilhol et al., 2015), which is inconsistent with the inferred P-T conditions of Alpine ophiolites (Fig. 1). The most straightforward means of interpreting the δ56Fe and Fe3+/ΣFe correlation is thus the release of isotopically light Fe-bearing fluid during prograde serpentinite devolatilization. In agreement with this interpretation, the Ol/Atg-serpentinites, which are interpreted as high-permeability reaction zones where fluids released during prograde metamorphism have been concentrated, display isotopically light δ56Fe values relative to the Atg-serpentinites (Fig. 1) and high concentrations of fluid-mobile elements (Debret et al., 2013).
Iron stable isotope fractionation is usually attributed to redox effects and experimental and theoretical studies that predict that, at equilibrium, Fe2+-bearing phases should be isotopically lighter than Fe3+-bearing phases (Polyakov and Mineev, 2000; Hill et al., 2010). This is in apparent contradiction with the inferred loss of a low-δ56Fe fluid and the inverse correlation between bulk serpentinite δ56Fe and Fe3+/ΣFe. One possible explanation is that the isotopically light composition of the fluids reflects kinetic (disequilibrium) isotope fractionation and the preferential mobility of the lighter isotope. In this case, the inverse correlation between δ56Fe and Fe3+/ΣFe could reflect the direct loss of Fe3+ during serpentinite prograde metamorphism. However, the mobility of Fe3+ relative to Fe2+ in aqueous fluids and brines is known to be low (e.g., Ding and Seyfried, 1992) and unrealistic amounts of Fe3+ (∼3 wt% Fe2O3) would need to be lost to explain the observed decrease in Fe3+/ΣFe from 0.7 to 0.5 (Fig. DR6). An alternative explanation is that isotopically light Fe is lost in the form of Fe(II)-S or Fe(II)-Cl complexes, as theory predicts that these complexes should show a preference for isotopically light Fe (Hill et al., 2010). In agreement with this scenario, subducted Alpine serpentinites have low S and Cl contents relative to abyssal serpentinites, providing evidence in support of the mobility of these elements in serpentinite-derived fluids (e.g., Alt et al., 2012; Debret et al., 2014b). This is confirmed by the presence of Cl- and S-rich polyphase fluid inclusions preserved within metamorphic olivine and garnet from Alpine metaophiolites (e.g., Scambelluri et al., 2015). The release of such fluids during serpentinite devolatilization can have a large impact on element mobility, since many nominally immobile elements are mobile in Cl-rich fluids (e.g., Rapp et al., 2010).
Perhaps most important, the proposed loss of isotopically light Fe associated with SOX species during serpentinite devolatilization may also have a large effect on mantle wedge redox evolution (e.g., in the case of SO42–, 1 mol of S6+ can oxidize 8 mol of Fe2+ as SO42– is reduced to S2– in the mantle wedge). The S budget of abyssal serpentinites is dominantly controlled by sulfides (e.g., Alt and Shanks, 2003). The decrease in serpentinite S concentration with prograde metamorphism therefore suggests that serpentinite dehydration is associated with sulfide breakdown and the release of sulfur (Hattori and Guillot, 2007). The presence of equilibrated hematite-magnetite assemblages (Fig. DR2) in the most depleted, low Fe3+/ΣFe and heavy δ56Fe serpentinites shows that S transport in serpentinite-derived fluids must have taken place at high oxygen fugacity (fO2), close to the hematite-magnetite buffer (Debret et al., 2015; Tumiati et al., 2015). At such P-T-fO2 conditions, sulfur will be mobilized as SO42–(aq) (aq—aqueous) rather than reduced species such as HS–(aq) (Fig. DR7). This is consistent with recent observations of SO42– in diamond-bearing fluid inclusions from Western Alps metaophiolites (Frezzotti et al., 2011). In this scenario, the oxidation of slab sulfides (FeS in Equation 1 for simplicity) to sulfates can also explain the concurrent decrease in serpentinite bulk Fe3+/ΣFe, e.g.,
Given that typical ocean-floor serpentinites and eclogite facies Atg serpentinites have Fe3+/ΣFe ratios of ∼0.7 and ∼0.5, respectively, and both contain ∼8 wt% of Fe2O3total (Fig. DR6), Equation 1 predicts that as much as ∼800 ppm sulfur and a minor quantity of Fe (∼0.1 wt%) will be released in serpentinite-derived fluids. This value, although speculative, is broadly consistent with the observed decrease in sulfur content (Hattori and Guillot, 2007; Alt et al., 2012; Debret et al., 2014b) and the relatively constant Fe2O3total (Fig. DR6) of serpentinites during subduction. This is, however, a minimum estimate. For example, if S was originally present as S– and released as SO–, S2O32–, or SO32–, then the amount of S released would be significantly larger for the same amount of Fe loss. Our results therefore suggest that slab serpentinite devolatilization is associated with Fe reduction and the oxidation and mobilization of sulfides, and potentially other reduced species. The migration of these fluids from the slab to the slab-mantle interface or mantle wedge and the reduction of slab fluid SOX to (Fe)S2– and concomitant oxidation of mantle wedge Fe(II) to Fe(III) may therefore provide an oxidized mantle source region for primary arc magmas (e.g., Kelley and Cottrell, 2009; Fig. 4).
We thank G. Nowell (Durham University, UK) for technical support; L. Cottrell, S. Guillot, S. Klimm, and N. Malaspina for constructive reviews; and J. Brendan Murphy for his careful editorial handling. This work was supported by a Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) Deep Volatiles Consortium Grant (NE/M000303/1) and a European Research Council (ERC) Starting Grant (HabitablePlanet; 306655) to Williams. Williams also acknowledges NERC Advanced Fellowship NE/F014295/1. Bouilhol acknowledges support from an ERC Starting Grant (MASE; 279828).
- Received 25 November 2015.
- Revision received 20 January 2016.
- Accepted 20 January 2016.
- © The Authors
Gold Open Access: This paper is published under the terms of the CC-BY license.